Re: [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
-
To: Kurt Kayser kurt_kayser@localhost
-
From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
-
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:38:35 +0100
-
Cc: Randy Bush randy@localhost, Arnold Nipper <arnold.nipper@localhost, routing-wg@localhost
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=jt3IM39/reF87/fA2vVXRq0I8hNDIvxDYq3hh6BlZCw0z/hGFjY1eAyRI5pvzyNh ;
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:18:40PM +0100, Kurt Kayser wrote:
> But I might be really wrong in order to save a couple of 2-Byte AS-numbers,
> but somehow I have the feeling that 2-Byte space is out much faster that
> anticipated.
Given the number of (recognized) IXes, the number of 2-Byte AS numbers,
and the number of "lost" AS numbers, I'd say that focussing on IXes is
not going to gain very much - but possibly causing lots of confusion
and problems in troubleshooting.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
