About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

.255 and .0 addresses

  • From: Volodymyr Yakovenko < >
  • Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:05:55 +0300

Dear Colleagues,

 I am not quite sure that routing-wg@ is a right place to ask my question, but
 nothing more convenient came to my mind :-)

 I am trying to push one BIG telecom equipment vendor TAC to consider wrong 
 situation with assignment of IP addresses like xxx.xxx.xxx.0 and 
 xxx.xxx.xxx.255 from dynamic IP pools bigger than or equal to /24.

 Quick googling has not shown any STD or BCP documents, which could be used 
 as reference, but has shown number of pages, saying something like "do not 
 use .0 or .255 addresses, it could cause problems".

 Our small research has shown that some sites are not reachable from .255 and
 .0 addresses.

 Are there any published documents or strong research results which could be
 used as reference point to illustrate this problem existance?

-- 
Regards,
Volodymyr.




<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community