Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks

[Jeff Williams <]

Daniel and all,

Daniel Karrenberg wrote:

> On 24.02 16:17, Michael.Dillon@localhost wrote:
> > >The RIPE NCC has prepared a draft document titled "De-Bogonising New
> > >Address Blocks":
> >
> > That is a misleading title.
>
> I thought it was to the point and rather cute ;-).
>

- snip-

>
> > Why can't ISPs subscribe to a feed of all new
> > RIPE allocations in near real-time?
>
> Personally I think this is a great idea and if we hear
> from a lot of operators actually willing to take such feeds
> it may become reality. However there are a number of serious issues
> with something like this, not the least of which are the liability
> issues in case this goes wrong very dynamically and semi-automatdly.

  I also agree this is a really good idea as well.  But also share the
concerns that many ISP's cannot or will not assume.

>
>
> It is certainly something to progress if there is enough interest.
>
> However I think the current proposal shold go ahead too because the false
> positives are a real problem now
>
> Daniel

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@localhost
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827