About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.

  • To: Daniel Concepcion < >
  • From: Arnold Nipper < >
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:55:44 +0200
  • Cc: "Nipper, Arnold" < >
    Jan-Ahrent Czmok < >
    Sabine Dolderer/Denic < >

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:31:21PM +0200, Daniel Concepcion wrote:
> 
> 
> Yes, but there is problem about the transit for the network of the IXP
> In my experience, some big providers only have the commercial view of 
> internet. 

If an IXP decides to offer infrastructural services then you have to buy
upstream of course.

> Really, if all the IXP members give some transit to the IXP for essential 
> services, internet will be more robust. 
> 

At least each IXP member would have direct connectivity to such
infrastructural services (DNS, NTP, WHOIS, NNTP??) and thereby their
customers would benefit from it.

And an IXP should be in a good position to get upstream :-)) And for
the commercials: these services are not for free of course. So bills
for IXP members will drop not raise.


-- Arnold





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community