Re: Suggestion for unallocated IP-Space
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:11:35 +0100
>Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:46:43 +1000
>From: Philip Smith pfs@localhost
>
>> b) Loss of the service in the midst of a DoS attack.
>
>I don't see why this is relevant. The idea is that the ISP taking the feed
>would build an access-list of denied networks probably on a daily basis, or
>however often they consider necessary. Pretty much as some ISPs build their
>BGP filters from the IRR at the moment.
Hi Philip et al,
I was wondering for a while what I should do with this BGP feed of
unallocated prefixes ... Now, after Philip has made it clear, why
aren't we simply putting those prefixes in the IRRs (e.g. as a route-set,
or simply as routes with a specific/reserved origin-AS) and let
interested ISPs use their usual (RA)toolset to build filters at their
regular schedules ?
>Please don't suggest going down the path of further overburdening the DNS.
>Having routing dependant on a higher layer protocol is not too clever.
I wouldn't like this either, but that's a different story ;-)
Cheers
CP
--- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
--- Christian Panigl : Vienna University Computer Center - ACOnet ---
--- VUCC - ACOnet - VIX : -------------------------------------------- ---
--- Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Mail: Panigl@localhost (CP8-RIPE) ---
--- A-1010 Vienna / Austria : Tel: +43 1 4277-14032 (Fax: -9140) ---
--- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
|