Re: Strange information in different routing regestries?

["Vladimir A. Jakovenko" <]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:59:05PM +0100, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
>>Subj:	Strange information in different routing regestries?
>
>  Well, "strange" ... ?
>  
>  Some organisations decided to run Routing Registries in order to support
>  their mission and/or their own operational environment. 
>
>  In general, there is no mechanism to synchronise duplicate or multiple
>  parallel entries when an update is made to _one_ of the registries.

There could be at least one mechanism to prevent creation of duplicate/wrong
records in Routing Registries - to limit creation of entries only to limited 
set of inetnum/as-num ranges.

>  It is up to the user/maintainer of a certain block of addresses (or his
>  or her up-stream ISP(s)) to (manually) keep those entries up-to-date or
>  to get them removed - whatever is appropriate.

Sorry for may be so stupid question, but are there any documents which 
describe relations between Routing Registries, Regional Internet Registries 
and ICANN in the view of one distributed, non contradicted Routing Policies
Database ?

>>Is this normal?
>
>  I wouldn't dare to classify what you c/should regard as normal" :-)
>  
>  Cheers,
> _________________________________:_____________________________________
>  Wilfried Woeber                 : e-mail: Woeber@localhost
>  UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
>  Universitaetsstrasse 7          : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
>  A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe  : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- 
Regards,
Vladimir.