About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: Multihoming - Resilience or Independence

  • To: "'Kurt Erik Lindqvist KPNQwest'" < >
    "Lu, Ping" < >
  • From: "Lu, Ping" < >
  • Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:58:07 -0400
  • Cc:

> > That's why filtering /20 only without re-aligning the holes 
> in the block
> > won't
> > work. In the end /20 make the routing table looks pretty 
> but they are
> > black-holing
> > lots of traffic.
> 
> Well, it won't. The proposal for filtering is to filter on assigment
> boundary, and for swamp space filter on /24. Now, what will break is
> people punching holes in their PA space for multihomed users. Funny
> enough, this has never been discussed (to my knowledge) as a 
> problem in
> PTOMAIN WG of the IETF. There the argument was for traffic 
> engineering and
> commercial relationships...
> 

Even for PI and swamp space, if the organization divides their space among
different ISPs for
multi-homed links. You still got a problem.   

> > As we all agree that re-assign address is NOT practical at 
> all thus just
> > filtering
> > /20 block is not a good solution.
> 
> That is not the suggestion. See above. The assignments per 
> block and RIR
> is well known.

Well known and lots of holes in it. That's the problem.


Ping Lu
Cable & Wireless USA
Network Tools and Analysis Group
W: +1-703-292-2359
E: plu@localhost




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community