About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: Multihoming - Resilience or Independence

  • To: "Lu, Ping" < >
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist KPNQwest < >
  • Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:39:16 +0200 (MEST)
  • Cc: "lir-wg@localhost" < >
    "routing-wg@localhost" < >
  • Reply-to: Kurt Erik Lindqvist KPNQwest < >

> That's why filtering /20 only without re-aligning the holes in the block
> won't
> work. In the end /20 make the routing table looks pretty but they are
> black-holing
> lots of traffic.

Well, it won't. The proposal for filtering is to filter on assigment
boundary, and for swamp space filter on /24. Now, what will break is
people punching holes in their PA space for multihomed users. Funny
enough, this has never been discussed (to my knowledge) as a problem in
PTOMAIN WG of the IETF. There the argument was for traffic engineering and
commercial relationships...

> As we all agree that re-assign address is NOT practical at all thus just
> filtering
> /20 block is not a good solution.

That is not the suggestion. See above. The assignments per block and RIR
is well known.

Best regards,

- kurtis -





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community