RE: Another issue related to the migration

["Lu, Ping" <]

Andrei,
  The existing ripe2rpsl tool will automatically translate "AS-" to "ASN-"
for the aut-num object and I think "ASN-" is more meaningful than "AS_".

Best Regards.

Ping Lu
Cable & Wireless Global
Network Tools and Analysis Group, USA
W: +1-703-292-2359
E: plu@localhost


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrei Robachevsky [
	    
	    
]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:10 AM
> To: db-wg@localhost routing-wg@localhost Migration TF; lir-wg@localhost
> Subject: Another issue related to the migration
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> [Apologies for duplicate messages]
> 
> One issue related to RIPE-181 to RPSL migration escaped our 
> attention and has
> not been discussed. It is related to reserved prefixes that 
> cannot appear in
> object names according to RPSL specification (RFC2622) which says: 
>       
> "Names starting with certain prefixes are reserved for 
> certain object types. 
> Names starting with "as-" are reserved for as set names. 
> Names starting with
> "rs-" are reserved for route set names.  Names starting with 
> "rtrs-" are
> reserved for router set names. Names starting with "fltr-" 
> are reserved for
> filter set names. Names starting with "prng-" are reserved 
> for peering set
> names."
> 
> Unfortunately "as-name:" attribute is an object name in RPSL 
> and we have 133
> aut-num objects with as-name starting with reserved 'AS-' prefix.
> 
> Our suggestion how to deal with these objects is:
> 
> 1. Send a message to the maintainers of these objects asking 
> them to change the
> name to avoid conflict with RPSL specification.
> 2. Give two-week notice period after which ripe-dbm will 
> convert non compliant
> as-names using the following mapping: AS-ASNAME -> AS_ASNAME.
> 
> This is more a "cosmetic" change as as-name is not even a 
> lookup key in the RIPE
> Database.
> 
> Your comments and suggestions are appreciated.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> Andrei Robachevsky
> DB Group Manager
> RIPE NCC
>