About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: About address allocating (IPv6, variable length SLA/prefixes?)

  • To: Steve Deering < >
  • From: Brian E Carpenter < >
  • Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:49:40 -0500
  • Cc: Ole Troan < >
    "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
  • Organization: IBM

Steve Deering wrote:
> 
> At 10:06 AM -0500 5/22/00, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >Yes, but there are other problems if you subnet to the right of /64
> >(autoconfiguration for example).
> 
> It depends on the address format.  Not all format prefixes require the
> 64-bit interface ID field.
> 
> Agreed that, in the global aggregatable format, subnet prefixes longer
> than /64 create problems.
> 
> However, implementations should be kept unaware of the magic /64 boundary,
> as much as possible.  (Obviously, the piece of code that does stateless
> autoconfig has to know about it, but certainly not any routing code.)

I didn't mean to imply otherwise.

  Brian





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community