About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: hierarchical route objects, part 1

  • To: Gabor Kiss < >
  • From: Cengiz Alaettinoglu < >
  • Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:25:34 -0800
  • Cc:
  • Posted-date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:25:34 -0800

Gabor,

For a second lets assume that all the address registries did
maintainer delegation. It still does not work.

Gabor Kiss (kissg@localhost) on January 9:
> This can be prevented by this object
> route:     0.0.0.0/0
> descr:     for authorisation purposes
> origin:    AS0
> mnt-lower: MAINT-INTERNIC
> etc.
> 
> Internic (or whatever else) may delegate maintainer rights as well
> as allocates address ranges.

Say, I have 128.8/16, internic delegates me as the maintainer. You
have 128.9/16 and are delegated for it. Foo aggregates 128.9/16 and
128.8/16 into 128.8/15. But no entity allocated 128.8/15, so foo is
not delegated as the maintainer. You and I can not delegate foo either
since aggregation is a local foo matter. 0.0.0.0/0 route object will
prevent foo from registering 128.8/15.

Cengiz

-- 
Cengiz Alaettinoglu           Information Sciences Institute
(310) 822-1511                University of Southern California
http://www.isi.edu/~cengiz




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community