Re: [centr-dnr-forum] Re: Deletion of person objects. Final reminder

The process of deletion itself is clear. I'm just wondering 
about the consequences of your statement.

>  Further to this deletion, and in order to avoid replication of the
>  current situation after this deletion process, incoming messages
>  containing person and role objects originating from domain name
>  related activities will NOT be processed.
>
>  The RIPE NCC will contact any source of such messages in order to
>  clear any possible misunderstandings.
 
Are you going to check if the data of a new requested handle 
were used before as a domainonly referenced handle ?
Would you block that and we couldn't request a new handle
with this specific data for an inetnum object ?


regards,

  Andreas Wittkemper


> If your "handle" is being used for IP registration our any IRR 
> related function, it will be referenced from an already existing 
> object in the RIPE Database and will therefore NOT be deleted.
> 
> If your handle was only in use for domain (other that in-addr.arpa) 
> registration purposes, then your contact information should be 
> registered with the corresponding TLD administrator as it will be 
> deleted from the RIPE Database.
> 
> No new handles are being created in this process as only handles used 
> for functions foreign to the RIPE Database will be deleted in the 
> process later today.
> 
> Hopes this clarifies the situation for you, if not, please contact me.
> 
> Regards,
> Joao Damas
> RIPE NCC
> 
> At 16:01 +0200 21/9/01, Andreas Wittkemper wrote:
> >Hi Joao,
> >
> >
> >>  Further to this deletion, and in order to avoid replication of the
> >>  current situation after this deletion process, incoming messages
> >>  containing person and role objects originating from domain name
> >>  related activities will NOT be processed.
> >>
> >>  The RIPE NCC will contact any source of such messages in order to
> >>  clear any possible misunderstandings.
> >
> >
> >Just for clarification. If a customer had a RIPE Handle which was
> >needed for the domain adminc, we won't get a new handle which we'll
> >use for a netassigment ? Considered that the old one would have been
> >deleted by tomorrow latest.
> >
> >regards,
> >
> >   Andreas Wittkemper
> 
> 
>