Re: in-addr.arpa

[Geert Jan de Groot <]

Hi Hank,

The Internic is fighting an overload problem (sounds familiar, doesn't it?),
and wants you to set up 114.192.in-addr.arpa yourself, so you can do the
rest of the delegations yourself without Internic involvement. 
This will of course be faster for new delegations, 
so it is also beneficial to you.

The message might be  confusing because the Internic didn't realize 
the exact situation; the message itself is normally sent to people
in the US asking for reverse delegation.
Nevertheless, I think delegation of the block is still a good idea.

Unless there are problems, I suggest you go ahead and set up the
block delegations. The RIPE NCC is willing to run secondary for the
zones on ns.ripe.net; contact inaddr@localhost for details.

If there are problems, please do not hesitate to ping us.

Kind regards,

Geert Jan de Groot


On Tue, 08 Nov 94 14:13:04 IST  Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Up till a week ago I would send in my in-addr.arpa requests to
> internic.net.  They are now telling me they don't handle it anymore.
> How do other sites handles in-addr.arpa registrations?

!From: Inaddress Registration Role Account inaddr@localhost
!Subject: Re: Plz add to in-addr.arpa zone
!To: HANK@localhost (Hank Nussbacher)
!Date: Thu, 3 Nov 1994 13:46:58 -0500 (EST)
!
!Dear Coordinator:
!
!
!Your request is in the block of 192.114.0.0 - 192.118.255.0. 0ur policy is
!to delegate the block to the listed Service Provider.  It is the Service
!Providers responsiblity to provide inaddr service to networks within this
!block and to notify potential requestors to contact them instead of the
!INTERNIC on server additions, changes, and etc.
!
!Please contact your Service Provider to initiate inaddr service.
!
!Regards,
!Registration Serivce