Re: neutral interconnects in Europe
-
To: Peter Dawe <>
-
From: Frode Greisen <>
-
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 1994 11:30:05 +0100 (MET)
On Fri, 21 Jan 1994, Peter Dawe wrote:
> While I welcome this paper I think that it is ill judged that
> a INIX does not also require connection to at least one European
> D-GIX. As a result an INIX could send all their european traffic
> via the US.
>
> Peter Dawe
>
Peter,
As Kees says and as is also written in our paper, we recommend that
INIXes develop into D-GIXes as the D-GIX technology becomes deveoped
first for pilots and then for production ( and the first I in INIX
stands for interim).
As there are no operational D-GIXes, we could not require connectivity
to a D-GIX. In contrast, the GIX is operational and connection to the
GIX is the best guarantee for global connectivity.
Obviously, we also support the recommendation not to send
intra-European traffic via the GIX. However, I don't think there is
today any GENERAL way to avoid this and I guess it is one of RIPE's
functions to try to make sure this does not happen.
I note that in our definition, you and Janet have just announced what
appears as an INIX to me.
Frode
|