Re: [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:46:33 +0100
>However, the document under discussion appears to offer X.509 as the
>only method for securing communication with RS mailboxes,
If this is the case then I strongly suggest to amend the wording!
>the
>alternative is continue as today, where this communication is going
>unsigned and in the clear in both directions.
Not really, the Reg.Serv Dept. obviously applies PGP signatures to
outgoing mail by default (see below). And I really appreciate that!!
>Regards,
>
>- Håvard
Regards,
Wilfried.
______________________________________________________________________
To: Woeber@localhost
Subject: NCC#2004xxxxxx AW raise
From: RIPE NCC Hostmaster hostmaster@localhost
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:18:10 +0100
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
------------=_1075472293-11892-0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 280
Dear Wilfried,
Thank you for approaching us this morning. We have decided to raise
your Assignment Window from /xx to /xx (you will receive an official
approval message within a few moments).
If you have any question please let us know.
Kind regards,
Andrea Cima
RIPE NCC
-
------------=_1075472293-11892-0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: For info see https://www.ripe.net/rs/pgp/
iD8DBQFAGmelaF6b6AtxYiURAmMIAJ4kseNxvU+D7NoFdPpe8ikAY2EYRwCfW8pm
Ww6xtXPHUtuKACSDvWMq0Q8=
=eCb7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------=_1075472293-11892-0--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|