Re: [ncc-services-wg] Reverse DNS Restructuring Project

[Bruce Campbell <]

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Daniel Roesen wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:39:28PM +0200, Olaf M. Kolkman wrote:
> >     - Once a delegation at a /16 boundary is made the more specific
> >       /24 domain objects are ignored.
>
> Hm. This has to consequences which I can see off-hand:
> - higher resolution delays as more indirection is involved

In abstract terms, this project merely changes the authoritative data
source for the DNS-based data (delegations), moving it from the current
zone files, to the RIPE Database.  No additional DNS indirection is
involved or created by this project.

( Note that the NCC currently secondaries /16-level zones on ns.ripe.net
  when /16-level delegations are requested, thus cutting out one level of
  indirection when queries hit ns.ripe.net .  No change to this behaviour
  is introduced by this project )

> And: you're saying that this is part of a filter between the database
> and the actual zone file generation. Wouldn't this introduce possible
> inconsistencies between DNS data and database data?

The end goal is that the authoritative DNS data is taken from the
Database, such that barring the lag time (minimal) between a Database
update, and publication of the same data in DNS, there are no
inconsistencies between the two data sets.

Kind regards,

-- 
                             Bruce Campbell                            RIPE
                   Systems/Network Engineer                             NCC
                 www.ripe.net - PGP562C8B1B             Operations/Security