About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org

  • To: "Niall O'Reilly" < >
  • From: Daniel Karrenberg < >
  • Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:06:40 +0200
  • Cc: RIPE NCC Services WG < >

On 10.09 16:40, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> 
> >Membership is open to anyone using the
> >RIPE NCC services.
> 
> Does this mean a non-LIR can be a member?
> How does that work in practice?

Touche! 

It used to be possible to become a LIR without getting an allocation.
After having focusseed this discussion here really do not want to
expand it again to address-policy ;-) I am sure this will be 
rationalised there eventually ;-(.

Maybe we need a "sponsoring member" category where organisations
like sympathetic ccTLDs could do their duty without contracts and
SLAs. This would serve the purpose of fairness as explained in my 
original mail without the darn overhead of SLAs, liabilities and
other such overhead. Maybe we could have them in several, self
assessed sizes too. (deja-vu! ;-)

Any takers?

Daniel



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community