Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:29:30 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: Hank Nussbacher hank@localhost,Joerg Schumacher schuma@localhost,RIPE DNS Working Group dns-wg@localhost,RIPE NCC Services WG ncc-services-wg@localhost
On 10.09 16:48, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 11:36 AM 10-09-03 +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> > ...
> >How would this endoresement be determined?
>
> Each LIR would be entitled to one ccTLD to be monitored. Most won't need
> it. Assuming there are about 50 countries in the RIPE area, and about 3500
> LIRs, I am sure that one can find a LIR to support a ccTLD to be
> monitored. That means that the other countries in ARIN/APNIC/LACLIC would
> have to fund their own service.
Now this *is* simple-minded:
The end-game is that we monitor all TLDs because there are less TLDs
than RIPE NCC members and there will be some of them intereste in TLDs
outside the RIPE region and many of them will be interested in some gTLDs.
Next we will get questions about 2nd level domains.
Try again.
Hint: One might establish a ranking and set a monitoring capacity.
Daniel
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
