About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org

  • To: Daniel Karrenberg < >
  • From: Hank Nussbacher < >
  • Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:48:51 +0200
  • Cc: Joerg Schumacher < >
    RIPE DNS Working Group < >
    RIPE NCC Services WG < >

At 11:36 AM 10-09-03 +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
On 10.09 12:18, Hank Nussbacher wrote:

> RIPE NCC should only monitor those ccTLDs that are LIRs or that their LIR
> is willing to endorse.   -Hank

I like the principle. However ....

How would this endoresement be determined?
Each LIR would be entitled to one ccTLD to be monitored. Most won't need it. Assuming there are about 50 countries in the RIPE area, and about 3500 LIRs, I am sure that one can find a LIR to support a ccTLD to be monitored. That means that the other countries in ARIN/APNIC/LACLIC would have to fund their own service.

-Hank
LIR: il.iucc


Doing it simple-mindedly potentially leads to a *very* long list of
domains to monitor, and not only (cc)TLDs.


Daniel



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community