Re: [ncc-services-wg] dnsmon - why?

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <]

On måndag, sep 8, 2003, at 07:49 Europe/Stockholm, Axel Pawlik wrote:

> At 06/09/2003 22:08 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> > My point is that now that there is an ncc-services list, that the 
> > RIPE NCC, whenever a new service is decided upon, that a message be 
> > sent to the ncc-services list, giving a short description of the 
> > service, the rationale for setting it up, and the estimated budget 
> > and manpower needed to run the service.
> Hank, all,
>
> this is certainly something that I agree with.
> And have said so earlier.

This is to my knowledge one of the intents of the working group. As was 
also said in Amsterdam by both me and Axel.

I took away two things from the WG meetings

1) We need to go through the activity plan in detail. At least then we 
might get the people awake to know about it - and _then_ we can have 
useful discussions (nothing intended to the people that _did_ talk. You 
where just very few....).

2) We need a more detailed financial walk-through matching the activity 
plan.

I talked briefly to Axel in the hallway afterwards and he seemed 
positive to this.

Best regards,

- kurtis -