About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks

  • To: Nigel Titley < >
  • From: Axel Pawlik < >
  • Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:51:48 +0200

At 28/08/2003 16:31 +0100, Nigel Titley wrote:
Legally, what we do is for remote voters to allocate their proxy to the
chairman, who then "takes instructions" electronically to cast the vote
as required. I don't know whether this would work under Dutch law, and
it would also have some problems with the 2% proxy rule.
Like I said before, the Dutch law currently does not
recognise electronic voting for the purposes of the
GM.

That doesn't mean that it couldn't be used for
other purposes. We should however consider carefully
where and why we would want to depart from the consensus
principle.

Having said that, we have been talking to our RIR
collegues, to evaluate the electronic voting setup
they are using. In the same vein, it would be interesting
to get a look at the LINX setup.


cheers, Axel



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community