|
|
 |
Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:38:46 +0200
Are you also saying that having to have the AGM vote is a problem? In
that case how would you else want to do it? Voting anytime through out
the year if enough people called for a vote? That would make it more
or less impossible to make or follow a budget in any reasonable way.
I do not believe that the use of the AGM is appropriate for the "big
switch"
being used to approve a proposed budget that included 100% of
projects. The
budget needs approval, but it appears to much "yes or no". There is no
consultation - formal, bot mailing list chatter - on what projects are
approved for inclusion into said budget approval.
I don't to objections preceding the discussions of the budget
decisions, on the contrary - that is the idea with this WG. However,
the decision needs to be taken by the NCC membership alone, and not in
a public forum. This is the AGM.
Best regards,
- kurtis -
|
|
 |
 |