About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks

  • To: "Peter Galbavy" < >
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist < >
  • Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:38:46 +0200
  • Cc: "Kurt Jaeger" < >
    < >

Are you also saying that having to have the AGM vote is a problem? In
that case how would you else want to do it? Voting anytime through out
the year if enough people called for a vote? That would make it more
or less impossible to make or follow a budget in any reasonable way.
I do not believe that the use of the AGM is appropriate for the "big switch"
being used to approve a proposed budget that included 100% of projects. The
budget needs approval, but it appears to much "yes or no". There is no
consultation - formal, bot mailing list chatter - on what projects are
approved for inclusion into said budget approval.
I don't to objections preceding the discussions of the budget decisions, on the contrary - that is the idea with this WG. However, the decision needs to be taken by the NCC membership alone, and not in a public forum. This is the AGM.

Best regards,

- kurtis -




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community