[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary ofthe PI ......
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:48:41 +0300 (IDT)
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Peter Galbavy wrote:
> Stephen Burley wrote:
> > 1.registry services (good and timely)
> > 2. database repository (and related DB functions)
> > 3. Training services (mainly for new LIR's to get them up to speed)
> > 4. RIPE meeting organization
>
> I agree with 1-3. I think 4 should be a "spare time" activity or one
> organised by an EU Internet "club". If 4 can be done part time by *one*
> person, then I am happy to pay for my part of the time.
i agree with 1+2+4. 3 should be covered on a cost basis by the attendees.
if the cost of a training session is 5000euro (room, lunch, instructor
time, etc) and 25 attend, then the cost should be 200euro per attendee,
with no affect on the overall ncc budget.
>
> Peter
>
Hank Nussbacher
|