Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261

[Carlos Morgado <]

On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:32:39PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:


> If the ISP dies hard enough so that their prefix will disappear, they 
> won't be visible to people that filter on /32 boundaries and have no
> fallback default route to one of their upstreams.
> 
> But so what.  If one of their upstream ISPs messes up seriously enough,
> they can always hurt their downstream customers' routing (by announcing
> the prefix and then blackholing internally, for example).
> 

(short, that's not how stuff works)

Again, I thought the point was making commercial IPv6 multihoming work. 
This is all fine and dandy on 6bone but my clients will not pay me for a
backup link that won't work when the primary provider goes down. No pay,
no multihoming. No multihoming no commercial offering. No commercial
offering, no happy fun end-to-end IPv6. Game set and match.
(and yes, this is even more true for hosting than home users)


> Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  54837  (54495)
> 
I'm sorry, you were talking about PA holes ? 

cheers

-- 
Carlos Morgado chbm@localhost - Internet Engineering - Phone +351 214146594
GPG key: 0x75E451E2 FP: B98B 222B F276 18C0 266B  599D 93A1 A3FB 75E4 51E2
The views expressed above do not bind my employer.