About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261

  • To: "Gert Doering" < >
  • From: "Michel Py" < >
  • Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:14:27 -0700

Gert,

> Gert Doering wrote:
> The *benefit* of "/48 multihoming" is that you can filter those
> routes if you don't want to see them - then your routers will
> send packets down the /32 road, and eventually hit a router
> that knows about the /48 (which is why I consider this approach
> superior to "everybody gets a independent prefix", which I can't
> properly aggregate).

This does _not_ work in at least two cases:

- If someone implements RPF checks and someone else filters.

- If the primary ISP (the one that announces the /32) dies. The site is
dead as well. This is the #1 reason why organizations do multihome: they
want to be up even if their primary ISP tanks.

Please look at the following (4 slides, very short)
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/pa_holes.ppt
Then come back to me and tell me that PA holes and filtering work
together.
The slides should be self-explanatory but they were designed for live
presentation. I do welcome questions.

Michel.




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community