About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

[lir-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Discussion about RIPE-261

  • From: Carlos Friacas < >
  • Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 13:18:54 +0100 (WEST)

On Fri, 23 May 2003, Gert Doering wrote:

> Hi,

Hi.


(...)
> Speaking as "me personally" (this is not the official WG chair speaking
> here, just a concerned IPv6 user!), I have the following comments:
>
>  - The /23 allocations ICANN -> RIRs are bad, because they lead to
>    address space fragmentation, and the blocks are too small to do useful
>    allocation towards the LIRs.  Something NEEDS to be changed here.
>
>  - Nevertheless, I do NOT like the idea of a "common address pool".  People
>    want to be able to see the "region" that a prefix is coming from by
>    looking at the address.

Yes. At this point in IPv6 mainly to judge which path its best... through
tunnels (reaching far, but higher rtts) or native (short reach, but better
rtts)


(...)
>  - If people *really* go into "multiple /48s per site" multihoming,
>    source address selection works by doing a longest-match check, and
>    this will work better if same-region addresses have something like
>    a common prefix, instead of "everythins smeared everywhere".

Agree.


> So my personal recommendation would be:
>
>  - change the /23 allocation boundary ICANN -> RIR to something more
>    useful, like a /12 or so (a /12 means "512 of them are available,
>    so we're not yet burning bridges - but a /8 would work as well.  A
>    /16 is already somewhat tight).

Agree.
Bigger ICANN->RIR allocs, fewer (and aggregated) prefixes to memorize.

(...)


One thing we should perhaps consider about this (/8s, /12s or /16s) is
seeing the % of LIRs that ask/get v6 addresses, in order to make some
growth calculation...
(For my country, i've recently seen this figure and it is < 20%)


Regards,

./Carlos
                                                          "Networking is fun!"
--------------         [http://www.ip6.fccn.pt]            http://www.fccn.pt
cfriacas@localhost, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN, Wide Area Network Workgroup
F.C.C.N. - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional  fax: +351 218472167




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community