About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [lir-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Discussion about RIPE-261

  • To: "Michel Py" < >
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist < >
  • Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 08:50:08 +0200

In other words, what we are looking at is one /32 prefix per
country per large LIR, opposed to as many /32s a large LIR would need in
the long run anyway.
Actually what you are looking at is one /32 per LIR + one /32 per country per large LIR.

Without tweaking routing, a more efficient way would be to use the fact that IPv6 blocks are a lot larger than IPv4 blocks and simply give one /32 to every LIR. I guess this would only work with RIPE who have the concepts of LIRs but anyway.



- kurtis -




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community