|
|
 |
Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:22:54 +0100
32 bit AS numbers are possible, yes, but will not solve the core
problem.
Not until Moore makes a 2^32 entries large routing table usable. My
guess
is that these issues are interdependent -- We will get routers that can
handle these entries when there is an imminent risk that they will be
necessary.
There are two sides to this.
A) We need to buy time to get adoption of IPv6. Go for swamp or
anything that is easy to implement.
B) We need to fix IPv6. I am voting for 8+8 or 16+16. That will take
time. We will need a way to migrate there that is relatively pain-free
and that can cope with the swamp above. This will also make away with
the Moore limitation (if such a thing exists).
Who want's to write the drafts?
- kurtis -
|
|
 |
 |