About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing

  • To: Måns Nilsson < >
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist < >
  • Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:22:54 +0100

32 bit AS numbers are possible, yes, but will not solve the core problem.
Not until Moore makes a 2^32 entries large routing table usable. My guess
is that these issues are interdependent -- We will get routers that can
handle these entries when there is an imminent risk that they will be
necessary.
There are two sides to this.

A) We need to buy time to get adoption of IPv6. Go for swamp or anything that is easy to implement.
B) We need to fix IPv6. I am voting for 8+8 or 16+16. That will take time. We will need a way to migrate there that is relatively pain-free and that can cope with the swamp above. This will also make away with the Moore limitation (if such a thing exists).

Who want's to write the drafts?

- kurtis -




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community