|
|
 |
Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:19:28 +0100
I'm mainly talking about the lack of a feasible way for end-customers
to get working multi-homing. This ties directly into the "PI" space
question.
Multihoming today depends on the possession of an AS number. I see no
alternative to that prerequisite.
Size of current v4 routing table: roughly 120000 entries
Number of ASen visible : roughly 15000
So, if we simply give every AS number holder currently present in the
v4
table a /32 or so, with STRICT instructions to forget getting another
prefix until half that prefix is pingable, we attain several things:
This is what Pekka Savola proposed in his draft. People will start
screaming about 32-bit ASes. It's also similiar to my draft on creating
IPv6 swap space. There are less than 15000 LIRs. Each LIRs /32 is more
address space than most of them have today. Add the routes from all
remaining AS:es. I don't see the problem.
I am still waiting for the IPv6 routing table to reach 1000 routes.
Call me then.
- kurtis -
|
|
|
|
