About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing

  • To: Peter Galbavy < >
  • From: Gert Doering < >
  • Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:18:57 +0100
  • Cc: Gert Doering < >
    Fearghas McKay < >

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:17:11AM -0000, Peter Galbavy wrote:
> But there are many genuine reasons for getting PI - let us not forget. If
> someone thinks their PI assignment will be world routeable, good luck to
> them.

Right now, the global IPv6 policy has no provisions at all for PI 
assignments.  This could be changed, of course, if we ("the RIPE policy
making community") agree that this is a desireable goal.

Let me ask you a question, though.  What good is non-routeable PI (except
for the IXP peering mesh)?  So what good is it to have a policy that 
hands out PI without caring for routing?

(In the IPv4 world, as you might know, there has a task force been formed
to work on the PI policy - this conflict being one of the reasons behind)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  57021 (57147)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community