About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: Multihoming - Resilience or Independence

  • To: "Lu, Ping" < >
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist KPNQwest < >
  • Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:38:28 +0200 (MEST)
  • Cc: "lir-wg@localhost" < >
    "routing-wg@localhost" < >
  • Reply-to: Kurt Erik Lindqvist KPNQwest < >


> The point is we will aggregate other ISP's prefixes if they are CIDR able.
> Most of the case
> are there are holes in the range so CIDR is out-of-question.
> 
> While the other camp insist to filter out any routes more specific than /20.
> They are doing nothing to re-allocate their PA assigned to multi-homed
> customers so CW can CIDR them into /20.
> 
> The funny thing is the solution are controlled by the other camp but they
> are all talk but
> no action. (Or trying to tell you multi-homed is a bad idea because they
> can't deal with the
> routing table ).

I am not sure I am following you here. Are you saying that we should
re-adress customers so that we get larger blocks of PA space to give to
mulithomed customers? 

I think that re-addressing is pretty hard to do in any larger scale,
although that would certanly help some other issues. 

another good start would be to start reclaiming space that has been handed
out from various ISPs old B-space and later taken with the customer. I
know a few operators that have done that (including us to some extent),
and it's a rather demanding task but will help the operators and reudce
the routing table as well. 

- kurtis -





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community