Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

[David Kessens <]

Alain,

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:45:24PM +0200, BIDRON Alain           BRX/DAP wrote:
> 
> Do we really need to explore solutions again or do we need a new Draft
> from the RIRs taking into account those proposals and the consensus
> expressed around, and able to be approved by the community ?

I think that the problem description is quite clear. I think that it
is also clear that a majority of the people would like to have a
larger initial allocation.

However, it is not clear how big such an allocation should be, whether
there should be a uniform size of the initial allocation, whether
multi-national registries should be able to get more than one
allocation etc.

Next, we will also need to take a look at the definition of 80%
utilization, when people can come back to the regional registries for
more address space and how much address space they will get when they
come back and qualify for more address space. 

It's up to us as the RIPE community to identify these issues and to
advise the RIPE NCC on how to fix the current policy. So far, we have
done quite a good job in identifying the issues, it's now time to go
in more detail in order to define a workable allocation policy.

David K.
---