Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

[David R Huberman <]

To: lists-lir-wg-out@localhost
To: James Aldridge jhma@localhost


Reply-To: <E15UUhh-0001m9-00@localhost>

 
> The last reply from the RIPE NCC hostmasters said, "Because Supernational
> Registries may not receive multiple IPv6 allocations you would need to have
> allocated 80% of the networks in your current sTLA before we could issue more
> address space."

Please forgive my ignorance and allow me to ask, "where is it written that
Supernational Registries may not receive multiple sub-TLAs?"

Is this a RIPE NCC interpretation of the bootstrap criteria or is it
actually written down somewhere?

/david