Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

["Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <]

  James,
  
  I think we were talking about increasing the size of a sTLA (when the
  requirement for that can be documented), rather than allocating another
  sTLA?!
  
  Also, I seem to remember that the NCC reserves some space in the address
  tree for that, so you might be able to obtain a "2nd" sTLA back-to-back
  with the original one, which is equivalent to decreasing the prefix
  length.
  
  I guess you would be free to structure that (combined/extended) address
  space internally (for distribution to customers by more than one
  operational unit).
  
  But probably I am missing something essential here.
  
  Wilfried.
  ______________________________________________________________________

Of course, there would be at least one more sub-TLA allocated if the IPv4
rules for supernational registries were to be applied to IPv6 instead of
restricting these to only having a single sub-TLA allocation... :-(

James

-- 
James Aldridge,  Senior Network Engineer (IP Architecture)
                 KPNQwest, Singel 540, 1017 AZ Amsterdam, NL
                 Tel: +31 70 379 37 03; GSM: +31 65 370 87 07

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 _________________________________:_____________________________________
  Wilfried Woeber                 : e-mail: Woeber@localhost
  UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
  Universitaetsstrasse 7          : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
  A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe  : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  First things first, but not necessarily in that order....