About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index Threads >>>

Fw: RFC 3021 on 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Links

  • From: "Hans Petter Holen" < >
  • Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:09:17 +0100

FYI.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "RFC Editor" rfc-ed@localhost
To: <IETF-Announce: ;>
Cc: rfc-ed@localhost
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 7:31 PM
Subject: RFC 3021 on 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Links


> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>         RFC 3021
> 
>         Title:     Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links
>         Author(s):  A. Retana, R. White, V. Fuller, D. McPherson
>         Status:     Standards Track
> Date:       December 2000
>         Mailbox:    aretana@localhost, riw@localhost,
>                     vaf@localhost, danny@localhost 
>         Pages:      10
>         Characters: 19771
>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:  None
> 
>         I-D Tag:    draft-retana-31bits-03.txt
> 
>         URL:        ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3021.txt
> 
> 
> With ever-increasing pressure to conserve IP address space on the
> Internet, it makes sense to consider where relatively minor changes
> can be made to fielded practice to improve numbering efficiency.  One
> such change, proposed by this document, is to halve the amount of
> address space assigned to point-to-point links (common throughout the
> Internet infrastructure) by allowing the use of 31-bit subnet masks
> in a very limited way.
> 
> This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
> 
> This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for
> the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
> for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the
> "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the
> standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution
> of this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
> Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
> should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@localhost.  Requests to be
> added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
> be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@localhost.
> 
> Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
> an EMAIL message to rfc-info@localhost with the message body 
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs.  For example:
> 
>         To: rfc-info@localhost
>         Subject: getting rfcs
> 
>         help: ways_to_get_rfcs
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@localhost.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.echo 
> Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
> RFC-EDITOR@localhost.  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
> Authors, for further information.
> 
> 
> Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
> 
> ...
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader 
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
> of the RFCs.
> 

Attachment: ATT00280.dat
Description: Binary data

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <001218102845.RFC@localhost

  • Post To The List:
Chronological >>> Author    Subject Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community