Re: proposal for RIPE's IPv6-address space structure

[Per Gregers Bilse <]

On Nov 26, 10:20, Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@localhost wrote:
> If anyone can forecast the development curve of
> 
> 	- number and size of ISPs
> 	- interconnectivity model of ISPs
> 	- number and size of customers
> 	- connectiviy trends of customers (multi/single homed etc)
> 	- router capabilities
> 	- exterior routing technology
> 
> it is easy to engineer address space allocation and assignment
> procedures that produce good or even optimal results.  Unfortunately
> there is no consensus about these developments and the more wise people
> do not even try to speculate.  Therefore I would like to keep options
> open as long as possible and also use a scheme with lots of flexibility.

Amen.

People sometimes naively and innocently ask "When will the next
version of <insert any interesting protocol> be deployed?", believing
things are actually planned and orchestrated in great detail in
advance.  I always reply "Just before it's too late.".

That's the track record so far, and nothing suggests this will
change.  Currently that "too late" is in the next century, so
anything devised here and now can only be experimental, for
educational use.  Cast it in stone and it will float like a rock.

-- 
------ ___                        --- Per G. Bilse, Mgr Network Operations
----- /     /  /   __   ___  _/_ ---- EUnet Communications Services B.V.
---- /---  /  /  /  /  /__/  /  ----- Singel 540, 1017 AZ Amsterdam, NL
--- /___  /__/  /  /  /__   /  ------ tel: +31 20 5305333, fax: +31 20 6224657
---                           ------- 24hr emergency number: +31 20 421 0865
--- Connecting Europe since AS286 --- http://www.EU.net  e-mail: bilse@localhost