RE: IP addresses question

["Patrick M. van Eijk" <]

Dear Jean-Francois,

As the largest ISDN dial-in provider for internet-customers in the Netherlands we 
have established a network (270 B-channels) with IP address pools wich are 
dynamically assigned to the BRI/PRI ports.
We'll be happy to advice you (as a local-registry for ripe we also see the need for 
maintaining the current IP space !).

Lets have a contact early next year (due to hollidays).


Greetings

Patrick M. van Eijk
General Manager
Network Operations & Services
Planet Internet Holding B.V.
E-mail : pvaneijk@localhost

--- On Wed, 20 Dec 1995 17:57:51 +0100 (MET)  Jean-Francois Stenuit 
jef@localhost wrote:

>Received: from ncc.ripe.net (ncc.ripe.net [193.0.0.129]) by mailhost.pi.net 
(8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA01558; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 19:21:36 +0100
>Received: by ncc.ripe.net 
>	id AA08214 (5.65a/NCC-2.30); Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:00:08 +0100
>Received: from donald.interpac.be by ncc.ripe.net with SMTP
>	id AA08206 (5.65a/NCC-2.30); Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:00:03 +0100
>Received: from donald (jef@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by donald.interpac.be 
(8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id RAA27224 for local-ir@localhost; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 
17:57:53 +0100 (MET)
>Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 17:57:51 +0100 (MET)
>From: Jean-Francois Stenuit jef@localhost
>X-Sender: jef@localhost
>To: local-ir@localhost
>Subject: IP addresses question
>Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.90.951220174843.27069A@localhost>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Length: 1337
>
>Hello,
>
>We are currently fixing our routing policy for clients using dialup-ISDN 
>connections and are facing some problems.
>
>Theorically (Cisco point of vue), avery network should have a different 
>number. That means we need 3 network ranges (our network, ISDN network 
>and client network).
>
>As IP address space is becoming quite scarce these days, we don't want to 
>use registered addresses for the ISDN network (it doesn't have to be 
>visible from the Internet).
>
>We have three solutions :
>- use RFC1597 addresses, but there is no reverse DNS for such addresses 
>  (problem when doing a traceroute)
>- use some kind of unnumbered scheme, but it's difficult to manage on 
>  Cisco routers with multiple dial-in BRI.
>- use a registered addresses anyway ...
>
>Any advice, experience ?
>
>--
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>/Jean-Francois "Jef" Stenuit | Interpac Belgium NV/SA       |    // Amiga    \
>\Internet administrator      | 350/358 Avenue Louise Box 11 | \\//  fanatic  /
>/Phone (32)(2) 646-6000      | B-1050 Brussels              |  \/            \
>\Fax   (32)(2) 640-3638      | Belgium                      | & SparcStation /
>/Email stenuit@localhost   |                              |   addict ...   \
><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>

-----------------End of Original Message-----------------

-------------------------------------
Name: Patrick M. van Eijk
E-mail: pvaneijk@localhost
Date: 21-12-95
Time: 10:24:57
-------------------------------------