Re: DRAFT local registries list
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1993 10:23:34 +0100
> Geert Jan de Groot geertj@localhost writes:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 93 14:53:18 +0100 Erik-Jan.Bos@localhost wrote:
> > 3. This is more or less a feeling-issue (and *no*, I am not a native
> > speaker), but SURFnet is listed as "Non-Service Provider". This
> > sounds to me as "Provider of a Non-Service". Maybe another word
> > could be used, such as "NIC of last resort" or "Default NIC". But
> > again, I am not a native speaker.
>
> Would 'Service-Provider' and 'No Service-Provider' sound better to you?
>
> Geert Jan
>
Geert Jan,
seems like the term "Registry of last resort" to describe the current
"Non Provider" label agrees with a number of people. Unless anyone has
any better suggestions I propose to go with this.
anne
|