Re: (Non)-Uniqueness of Net Names

["Gartha S. Parrish" <]

I agree with Daniel that unique network names do serve a purpose.  In
addition to making it easier to discuss a specific network, there is a
recognition factor associated with a network name that just does not 
exist with an internet address.  I have discovered many errors because 
a net name didn't look right and when I checked, there was either a 
typo or some kind of mix-up with the number/numbers.  I would hate to 
see this error-checking "feature" removed.  
 
I would vote for keeping network names unique at least to the level of 
the organization or site.  This would leave the level of granularity up 
to individual organizations.  Network names would still be registered in 
the InterNIC and RIPE whois databases, and multiples would appear much as 
a block entry looks now. This would also be helpful in cases where 
troubleshooting is needed and either administrative or technical contacts 
must be reached.
 
					Gartha Parrish
					NSFNET/MERIT
================================================================

From dfk@localhost Tue Jul  6 04:18:51 1993
Received: from ncc.ripe.net by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0)
	id AA04697; Tue, 6 Jul 93 04:18:49 -0400
Received: from reif.ripe.net by ncc.ripe.net with SMTP
	id AA18025 (5.65a/NCC-1.3); Tue, 6 Jul 1993 10:18:47 +0200
Message-Id: <9307060818.AA18025@localhost>
To: Mark Knopper mak@localhost
Cc: RIPE NCC Staff ncc@localhost, merit-ie@localhost, conf@localhost,
        dsj@localhost, markk@localhost, scottw@localhost,
        Local Internet Registries in Europe local-ir@localhost
Subject: Re: (Non)-Uniqueness of Net Names 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 05 Jul 1993 23:14:10 EDT.
             <9307060314.AA18083@localhost 
From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@localhost
X-Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
X-Phone: +31 20 592 5065
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1993 10:18:46 +0200
Sender: Daniel.Karrenberg@localhost
Status: RO


  > 1) Should we remove the uniqueness requirement for net names in the
  > Merit and InterNIC/whois databases? 

This is worth cosidering seriously. Withou a whole lot of consideration
I tend to be in favour.
We should require uniqueness within some local domain such 
as an organisation or site.

  > 2) My understanding is that RIPE's database does not require existence
  > or uniqueness of net names. Is that correct?

No, we require exitence and uniqueness, although uniqueness is not
checked thoroughly for blocks.

  > 3) Do net names serve any useful purpose? 

Yes they do! As with all names they make it easier to talk about 
the object named. 

  > Should we get rid of them altogether?

So this answer is no.


  > What other people or organizations should be consulted in this process?

I'll copy the RIPE local registries group.

Daniel