Re: [ipv6-wg] RIPE NCC Makes Record Number of IPv6 Allocations
-
To: S.P.Zeidler spz@localhost
-
From: Dennis Lundstrom dennislun@localhost
-
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:47:12 +0100
-
Cc: Mohsen Souissi <mohsen.souissi@localhost, Ray Plzak plzak@localhost, "shane_kerr@localhost" shane_kerr@localhost, Alex Le Heux alexlh@localhost, "ipv6-wg@localhost" ipv6-wg@localhost
-
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=w0/pf2By6Ah2pk0uQoT6U8sDG2NpjQpv63Mtsnn+sic=; b=irZRFVemsmtm+nhZfv1Gi2QGvqvGT+IM6/9jcHLh22xWSsdfGUMdjrD/3oWqPv0a0o320T3wCPGaBfcgkG8HMn+oLLUfF4iZ/BPZvpYrQiWBudy36Lg3XoZ0iCVd3F1wJCHNtECsAhwGcmVwlgvMs41TudUxMTMGXAUx0WSpfWI=
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=gm6gT4fw1mpxMza90IH8q7lLUb1q/G0aSnAJdBg1CJ0rAfoyFHV/brDA4n5XGg/OfYLkx2OyLxmsLL7miP9EjuV1PTHXkCU02t/t07mdbU1G/AHW52vWqTXZqJoulBffX51JOQ7mn4z0pVnxyeos9DL8eN5YkJJsZvaW0okBLIM=
The main issue is I guess content, and services. What initial gains
does a service provider, or an end-user have in switching?
Since the protocol is not backward compatible. I guess motivation is
not exactly spelled.
-"Hey guys let's just sit back and play a bit of nethack, until
everyone else joins our new shiny internet"
There is also a point in keeping policy straight-forward, and simple
to understand. Since time is getting more and more of the essence.
Seems like these words are stated, again and again with nothing good
coming out in the end.
Maybe someone should compile a list of IPv6 cliches? :-)
best regards.
--Dennis Lundström
Adamo Europe S.L
On 14 dec 2007, at 17.00, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
Thus wrote Mohsen Souissi (mohsen.souissi@localhost):
<Provocation>
What if RIRs monthly published on their websites and
mailing-lists the TOP 10 of LIRs/Customers who received an allocation
and haven't used it for ages? Would that be a further incentive to
eventually start deployment? ;-)
</Provocation>
Those people that would most need to be slapped upside the head with a
large trout regarding deploying IPv6 (or keeping it deployed) wouldn't
know what a RIR was if it bit them.
Not implying that RIRs bite, here :)
regards,
spz
--
spz@localhost (S.P.Zeidler)
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
