Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 news - weekly summary
-
From: Bernhard Schmidt berni@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:24:23 +0200
-
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=birkenwald.de; s=test; t=1187641464; bh=7taXpvpUNy4OsEx0yqxeT0LjQJ2+yiIlpenhiLUMZZc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: X-Virus-Scanned:X-Virus-Status; b=BOkGeI0rJJHbqoRB3/5L2A4qIU1p+KoU 30Z2QOtVXStRMJlAw0TCrOvTuRSixyLUXRmc7Fftalq0OQmnXU5oqBrAmoRWwahH6rW /alZktQp6qYjU6C0WLR4mjXyM3Q1GHXKInf+2iVJsTDNxhOYporMRaraiuxHAjaZVdy KMX/I=
Hi Jordi,
will it become standard to post this weekly summary of IPv6 news, where
some of your featured stories mention IPv6 just in one small sentence?
Example
IT security: Too big for government
http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=3154
<http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=3154>
| However, there are bright spots. Companies are beginning to reduce the
| scope of vulnerabilities in their software and IPv6 is slowly moving
| forward, especially in Asia.
This is the only occurence of IPv6 in this text.
Occasional posting of really interesting news to this ml is fine in my
point of views, but gating every unrelated story that happens to have
"IPv6" somewhere in the text through your "portal" page isn't.
Just my 2 cents,
Bernhard
|