Re: [ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?
-
To: , ,
-
From: Gert Doering <>
-
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:53:36 +0100
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=CUXP0+goRTBFaYdHoV8YerSqzceO/VHXAYpyl6Ai1UYhSmhXHgePgL4liuR22o95 ;
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:08:47AM -0500, peter.sherbin@localhost wrote:
> Get rid of the current hierarchy which requires ISP in order to
> connect to the network. The Internet is an aggregation of interconnected
> networks. We want to replicate what the Mother Nature has already
> given us, i.e. a brain like structure where neurons (individual
> networks) have multiple direct connections with each other. As brain
> cells networks should have about the same size. Network prefix
> determines the size.
Ah, back to the source-route-bridged times of (ring-) explorer packets...
Sounds like a nice idea, would even be much more resilient than the
current structure.
Any IETF proposals where we can read up on how this is gonna work?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|