Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

[Gert Doering <]

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:58:50PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > That's the independently-networking end-user problem we have. PI would
> > solve that. Removal of the 200 customer rule would solve that. One-block-
> > per-LIR would solve that.
> 
> Doesn't need DENIC two blocks, one for their production network, and
> one for anycast?  Or would you be willing to subject yourself to an
> ISP for the production network?  

That's what DENIC is doing right now, doing BGP-multihoming with a 
/48 from their upstream ISP.  (Which is certainly something people *do*
disagree upon - but as they seem to be happy with their ISPs reliability, 
it will still work even if someone filters out the /48).

> Why not for anycast service?

It could certainly be done, but as there are going to be *many* instances,
distributed all over the place, it would be a lot less hassle to have
a network from a well-known block that people would know "hey, permit 
this through our filters, it's a TLD anycast network".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  81421

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234