About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

  • To: Florian Weimer <
    >
  • From: "Elmar K. Bins" <
    >
  • Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:10:47 +0100
  • Cc: Jeroen Massar <
    >,
    ,
  • Mail-followup-to: "Elmar K. Bins" elmi@localhost,Florian Weimer fw@localhost, Jeroen Massar jeroen@localhost,address-policy-wg@localhost, ipv6-wg@localhost
  • Organization: unorganized since 1789

fw@localhost (Florian Weimer) wrote:

> > That's the independently-networking end-user problem we have. PI would
> > solve that. Removal of the 200 customer rule would solve that. One-block-
> > per-LIR would solve that.
> 
> Doesn't need DENIC two blocks, one for their production network, and
> one for anycast?  Or would you be willing to subject yourself to an
> ISP for the production network?  Why not for anycast service?

How come, it's always you who knows what other people need?

Of course we are happy enough to connect our office to a potent ISP on
a PA block, no hassle. If they let us advertise the assignment on some
peering matrix and the partners take it, the better; but that's not
really necessary for an office.

Apart from that, we're working on solutions, both for registry services
production and for the DNS problem, and I am sure we will find them.

Elmar.




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community