About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

  • To: "Elmar K. Bins" <
    >
  • From: Florian Weimer <
    >
  • Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:18:02 +0100
  • Cc: Jeroen Massar <
    >,
    ,

* Elmar K. Bins:

> fw@localhost (Florian Weimer) wrote:
>
>> > That's the independently-networking end-user problem we have. PI would
>> > solve that. Removal of the 200 customer rule would solve that. One-block-
>> > per-LIR would solve that.
>> 
>> Doesn't need DENIC two blocks, one for their production network, and
>> one for anycast?  Or would you be willing to subject yourself to an
>> ISP for the production network?  Why not for anycast service?
>
> How come, it's always you who knows what other people need?

This was a real question, not a rhetorical one.  I was genuinely
wondering whether "one-block-per-LIR" would be enough.  Not everything
I wrote is intended to be provocative. 8-)




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community