Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
-
To: "Elmar K. Bins" <>
-
From: Florian Weimer <>
-
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:18:02 +0100
-
Cc: Jeroen Massar <>, ,
* Elmar K. Bins:
> fw@localhost (Florian Weimer) wrote:
>
>> > That's the independently-networking end-user problem we have. PI would
>> > solve that. Removal of the 200 customer rule would solve that. One-block-
>> > per-LIR would solve that.
>>
>> Doesn't need DENIC two blocks, one for their production network, and
>> one for anycast? Or would you be willing to subject yourself to an
>> ISP for the production network? Why not for anycast service?
>
> How come, it's always you who knows what other people need?
This was a real question, not a rhetorical one. I was genuinely
wondering whether "one-block-per-LIR" would be enough. Not everything
I wrote is intended to be provocative. 8-)
|