Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fixIPv6

[Carsten Schiefner <]

Hi Gert,

Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:14:33PM +0100, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> > Also, such a policy is most likely in direct conflict with one of the 
> > basic paradigms of a RIR - which is equal treatment of its members in 
> > equal circumstances.
> Circumstances before and after reaching a given number of routes are
> not "equal".
where _eaxctly!_ sits the difference between LIR #5000 and LIR #5001 - 
to pick up your example? And why is '5,000' _not!_ totally arbitrary?

Although I am mostly agnostic wrt. the general discussion here so far, I 
am absolutely in line with Andre Oppermann's comment that we better have 
profound and sound answers to those questions ready before such a policy 
would be put in place - because they would be asked the second after 
anyways, most likely by these well-known, interested third parties...

Best,

	Carsten