[ipv6-wg] De-aggregation of assigned IPv6 prefixes?

[Jeroen Massar <]

Hi,

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6policy.html#initial_criteria
reads amongst others:
8<-------------------
c) plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organisations to which it will
assign /48s by advertising that connectivity through its single
aggregated address allocation
-------------------->8

According to the above, after the /48, can one announce more specifics
or should/must one not do this? (*)

The RIPE Registry allows registering more specific route6 objects.
If this is allowed, then why is the above parrt, after '/48', then
included in the policy? What is the exact intention of the sentence?

Greets,
 Jeroen

*= of course one is lord of their own network and thus can announce
whatever one wants and just hope/agree that others accept it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature