About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fi x IPv6

  • To: "Bonness, Olaf" <
    >
  • From: Gert Doering <
    >
  • Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:58:30 +0100
  • Cc:
    ,
    ,
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=GRa5ZJrd0FdSJSpzwtr+q2RQotuJA/mT54tbfkYPZgKezPigiUDpv5mbi67O2tvO ;

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:13:03PM +0100, Bonness, Olaf wrote:
> > "Every LIR gets a /32 (upon request), no questions asked" is a concept
> > that I'm also happy with - as I have said before.  For those that are
> > afraid of the landrush: limit that policy to 5.000 LIRs per region.
> 
> Not sure if that works. Kind of "First come - first serve" thing.

Yes, so what shall we do instead?  

"Nobody gets addresses, no mistakes made"?

The whole point of this discussion is that there are two fractions:

 - one side is so afraid of doing the wrong thing that they want to
   delay everything until the perfect solution is found

 - the other side wants to get things rolling, and is willing to risk
   a few thousand entries in the global BGP table (whatever that is).

and I don't think we'll ever reach consensus between those groups.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  81421

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community