Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fi x IPv6
-
To: "Bonness, Olaf" <>
-
From: Gert Doering <>
-
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:58:30 +0100
-
Cc: , ,
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=GRa5ZJrd0FdSJSpzwtr+q2RQotuJA/mT54tbfkYPZgKezPigiUDpv5mbi67O2tvO ;
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:13:03PM +0100, Bonness, Olaf wrote:
> > "Every LIR gets a /32 (upon request), no questions asked" is a concept
> > that I'm also happy with - as I have said before. For those that are
> > afraid of the landrush: limit that policy to 5.000 LIRs per region.
>
> Not sure if that works. Kind of "First come - first serve" thing.
Yes, so what shall we do instead?
"Nobody gets addresses, no mistakes made"?
The whole point of this discussion is that there are two fractions:
- one side is so afraid of doing the wrong thing that they want to
delay everything until the perfect solution is found
- the other side wants to get things rolling, and is willing to risk
a few thousand entries in the global BGP table (whatever that is).
and I don't think we'll ever reach consensus between those groups.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|