Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
-
To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <>
-
From: Gert Doering <>
-
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:06:48 +0100
-
Cc: "Cameron C. Gray" <>, Per Heldal <>, ,
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=mYfqAB7bAEeqS67hYR54nisdhsyFfjCxOVBivaFPSB5EOQ3kQgMAV2ro7u/Xc9ZZ ;
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:17:25PM +0100, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> I think each LIR should get a /32 and we should drop the 200
> "customer" rule. But that is just me...
Actually I like the "every AS should get a <network>" approach (with
a yearly recurring fee for AS and network, to guarantee return of the
resources as soon as the importance of having a slot in the global
routing table doesn't outweigh the costs anymore).
"Every LIR gets a /32 (upon request), no questions asked" is a concept
that I'm also happy with - as I have said before. For those that are
afraid of the landrush: limit that policy to 5.000 LIRs per region.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
