About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

  • To: Geoff Huston <
    >,
    ,
  • From:
  • Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:12:58 +0000

> > ISPs do exist for customers, not customers do exist  to feed ISPs in the
> > most convenient way for the ISPs. Some folks seem to forget that,
> > looking at all the discussion trying to ignore the demand for real
> > multihoming (and that includes TE and network-wide routing policy
> > implementation, neither being delivered by things like shim6).
> 
> BTW... in Germany, the phone operators were forced to implement phone
> number portability by law. The regulator didn't care about all the
> whining from the telcos about that being impossible, uneconomic, the
> world will explode etc. If they manage to get that imposed on the
> traditional telcos, I wonder how much easier it will be to do that on
> the ISPs.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> 
> -- 
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@localhost -- dr@localhost -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

	why does this remind me of the law passed (in several different
	jurisdictions, if the urban myths are to be believed) that 
	mandated PI == 3.2.   ...  legal talent can not change some laws.

--bill



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community